Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JESSIE HENDRIX v. HARRY'S CADILLAC COMPANY, INC., AND GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.

Usury § 2 —

An action to recover alleged usurious interest paid cannot be maintained upon evidence disclosing that the transaction alleged was not a loan but was a sale with deferred payment secured by conditional sale contract. C. S., 2306.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action under C. S., 2306, to recover an amount of alleged usurious interest paid by the plaintiff to the defendants in a transaction involving the purchase and sale of a second-hand automobile, with deferred payments secured by conditional sale contract.

An examination of the evidence convinces us that the transaction involved was indeed a sale and not a loan, and therefore the cause of action alleged by the plaintiff is not sustained by the evidence. Note, 48 A. L. R, p. 1442; 57 A.L.R., p. 880; 91 A.L.R., p. 1105.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENDRIX v. CADILLAC CO
(Sep 1, 1941)