Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Joanne Semrow, Appellant, v. John Grohar, Jr., Appellee.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR, § 1021 — brief and argument failing to point out error. Alleged error of trial court in its rulings on the admission and rejection of testimony, and objections to conduct of counsel during trial, held abandoned where appellant failed to set forth in his brief and argument the rulings, testimony or conduct objected to, and failed to disclose where they could be found in the abstract.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

2. SAVING QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW, § 102fn_ — new trial motion, review of evidence dependent upon. Sufficiency of the evidence could not be reviewed where no motion for new trial was made in the trial court.

3. SAVING QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW, § 37fn_ — instructions, objections and exceptions as required. Where instructions complained of were substantially correct and jury was fairly instructed upon the issues, alleged error with respect thereto would not be considered, as no objections or exceptions had been made or taken in the trial court.

Opinion by JUSTICE DOVE.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed September 23, 1941.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SEMROW v. GROHAR
(Sep 23, 1941)