Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Industrial Roofing Company, Trading as Construction Materials Company, Appellees, v. Cora Meek, Appellant, G. W. Piatt et al., Copartners, Trading as G. W. Piatt Sons, Appellee.

1. MECHANICS' LIENS, § 201 — scope of recovery by contractor. Upon foreclosure of mechanic's lien, building contractor who has substantially performed his contract is entitled to recover the contract price, plus the cost of extras, but less any necessary expenses incurred by the owners in fulfilling the terms of the contract.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

2. MECHANICS' LIENS, § 10fn_ — defective performance caused by owner's change of plans as affecting contractor's right of recovery. Defects in performance of building contract which were caused by changes in the original plan at owner's instance cannot be made the basis of a claim that the contractor failed to perform his contract.

3. MECHANICS' LIENS, § 178fn_ — burden of proving cost of remedying defects in performance of contract. In suit to foreclose mechanic's lien by building contractor, burden of proving cost of remedying defects in performance of contract rests not on contractor, but upon owner, and statement to contrary in Art Craft Re-Roofing Co. v. Williams, 264 Ill. App. 477, will not be followed.

4. MECHANICS' LIENS, § 183fn_ — house construction contract as substantially performed. Building contract held substantially performed by contractor as against contention of owner that basement drain was attached to abandoned city drain and that as result basement became flooded, where contract made no provision for drain connections, contractor made the connection without charge, and owner insisted on depth to which basement was to be dug and indicated that she wished to avoid expense of digging to drainage connection with regular main; and as against further contention that joists were improperly spaced, where no damage was shown, and contract was ambiguous; and court properly foreclosed contractor's lien, after allowance for cost of remedying certain minor defects.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE HAYES.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed November 3, 1941; rehearing denied February 3, 1942.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INDUSTRIAL ROOFING CO. v. MEEK
(Nov 3, 1941)