Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of PHILIP M. SMITH, Appellant, against LESLIE E. BRIGGS, Respondent.

Order of the Appellate Division reversed and order of the Special Term affirmed in so far as it declares Philip M. Smith to be the nominee for said office by said party. We hold that ballots with exhibit numbers 13, 66 and 183 are blank as to the office of District Attorney. We hold that ballots with exhibit numbers 29, 32, 41, 100 and 122 are void. In other respects we agree with the findings of the Appellate Division. Accordingly we find that Philip M. Smith received 1,477 votes and Leslie E. Briggs 1,476 votes. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SMITH v. BRIGGS
(Oct 22, 1941)