Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Martin v. Kentucky West Virginia Gas Co. et al.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY VAN SANT, COMMISSIONER

Affirming.

We are without authority to review the decision of the trial court in declining to permit appellant to file the answer and cross-petition tendered, because the judgment appealed from specifically reserved for future adjudication the only issue presented by the rejected pleading. There being no other assignment of error the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. KENTUCKY WEST VIRGINIA GAS CO
(Nov 5, 1941)