Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN RE DISBARMENT OF LOUIS J. PLUTO. Reported in 300 N.W. 897.

Attorney and client — disbarment — admissions in answer to accusations.

Respondent, who was accused of 15 violations of the professional code of ethics controlling the conduct of lawyers, withdrew his answer when the matter came up for trial before a referee appointed by this court, and the matter then stood as upon default. Later, by verified petition, he asked leave to interpose an amended answer which contained admissions and was pregnant with other admissions showing that so many of the accusations made against him are true that on the face of the proposed answer he must be disbarred.

Proceeding for the disbarment of Louis J. Pluto, an attorney at law, referred to the Honorable A.B. Gislason, one of the judges of the ninth judicial district, as referee. Judgment of disbarment ordered.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent has been accused by the state board of law examiners of 15 violations of the canons of ethics governing the professional conduct of lawyers. Upon reference of the matter to a district judge as referee, respondent withdrew his answer previously interposed, and the matter then stood as upon default. It would be futile to discuss at length the various accusations made against respondent. Most of the charges involve misappropriation and conversion of funds. One charge accuses him of misconduct with jurymen. Any one of them if true would justify disciplinary action. Most of them would justify disbarment. All of them together show gross indifference to respondent's obligations to the court, his clients, and others.

Respondent has now applied to this court for permission to interpose a verified amended answer which contains admissions and is pregnant with other admissions showing that so many of the accusations made against him are true that on the face of the proposed answer we can do nothing less than disbar him.

It is therefore ordered that the respondent, Louis J. Pluto, be disbarred as an attorney and counselor of this court, that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys, and that judgment of disbarment be entered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE DISBARMENT OF LOUIS J. PLUTO
(Nov 28, 1941)