Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HENDERSON v. ANDERSON, SHERIFF ET AL.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Divided Court. The participating Justices being equally divided in opinion as to what disposition should be made of the case, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Chief Justice Young, Mr. Justice Bakke and Mr. Justice Knous are in favor of affirmance; whereas Mr. Justice Otto Bock, Mr. Justice Burke and Mr. Justice Hilliard are in favor of reversal. The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law as provided by Rule 118 (f) R.C.P. Colo.

Note: Mr. Chief Justice Francis E. Bouck was deceased at the time of the rendition of this opinion and no appointment had been made to fill the vacancy created by his death.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENDERSON v. ANDERSON
(Dec 1, 1941)