Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Workmen's compensation — Action against noncomplying employer to recover award — Employment of three or more workmen — Father in employ of farmer — Sons, paid by father, held employees of farmer — Record of proceedings before commission prima facie evidence — Section 1465-74, General Code — Equal protection — Due process.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.