Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. J. Carl Kearse, of Bamberg, and Mr. Carlisle Roberts, of Columbia, for appellant, cite: As to dependency of wife: Secs. 7035-38, 1936 Supp. to 1932 Code; Acts of 1936, 1231 et seq.; 200 N.C. 221; 156 S.E., 849. As to benefits to surviving wife: 197 S.C. 157, 14 S.E.2d 889; 201 N.Y.S., 588; 207 App. Div., 1; 122 N.Y. Supp., 463; 63 S.C. 126; 40 S.E., 1030. As to validity of separation agreement: 203 App. Div., 302 (N.Y.); 13 Rich., 157; Williston on Contracts, Rev. Ed. (1938), Sec. 1742; 161 S.C. 358; 159 S.E., 652; 147 N.E., 440; 35 A.L. R., 235 (Ill.). As to evidence to support commission's findings: 197 S.C. 157; 14 S.E.2d 889. Mr. George W. Keels, of Florence, for respondent, cites: As to benefits of Compensation Law in this case: Secs. 2 (n), 38, 39, Workmen's Compensation Act; 70 Pa. Super., 202; 175 N.W., 132; 190 Mich., 112; 155 N.W., 721. As to reasonable inferences to be drawn from the testimony: Secs. 39, 2(n), Workmen's Compensation Act; 156 S.E., 849; 86 A.L.R., 885; 176 S.C. 260; 180 S.E., 55. Counsel for appellant, in reply brief, cite: 186 S.C. 374; 195 S.E., 646; 185 S.C. 497; 194 S.E., 447; 191 S.C. 165, 4 S.E.2d 7; 207 Mich., 605; 175 N.W., 132; 190 Mich., 112, 155 N.W., 721; 53 S.W.2d 384 (Tenn.); 182 N.E., 622; 244 N.W., 807.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. J. Carl Kearse, of Bamberg, and Mr. Carlisle Roberts, of Columbia, for appellant, cite: As to dependency of wife: Secs. 7035-38, 1936 Supp. to 1932 Code; Acts of 1936, 1231 et seq.; 200 N.C. 221; 156 S.E., 849. As to benefits to surviving wife: 197 S.C. 157, 14 S.E.2d 889; 201 N.Y.S., 588; 207 App. Div., 1; 122 N.Y. Supp., 463; 63 S.C. 126; 40 S.E., 1030. As to validity of separation agreement: 203 App. Div., 302 (N.Y.); 13 Rich., 157; Williston on Contracts, Rev. Ed. (1938), Sec. 1742; 161 S.C. 358; 159 S.E., 652; 147 N.E., 440; 35 A.L. R., 235 (Ill.). As to evidence to support commission's findings: 197 S.C. 157; 14 S.E.2d 889. Mr. George W. Keels, of Florence, for respondent, cites: As to benefits of Compensation Law in this case: Secs. 2 (n), 38, 39, Workmen's Compensation Act; 70 Pa. Super., 202; 175 N.W., 132; 190 Mich., 112; 155 N.W., 721. As to reasonable inferences to be drawn from the testimony: Secs. 39, 2(n), Workmen's Compensation Act; 156 S.E., 849; 86 A.L.R., 885; 176 S.C. 260; 180 S.E., 55. Counsel for appellant, in reply brief, cite: 186 S.C. 374; 195 S.E., 646; 185 S.C. 497; 194 S.E., 447; 191 S.C. 165, 4 S.E.2d 7; 207 Mich., 605; 175 N.W., 132; 190 Mich., 112, 155 N.W., 721; 53 S.W.2d 384 (Tenn.); 182 N.E., 622; 244 N.W., 807.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

YOUNG ET AL. v. HYMAN MOTORS, INC., ET AL.

March 6, 1942. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CIRCUIT JUDGE WM. H. GRIMBALL, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE.

This Court being satisfied with the correctness and reasoning of the well considered order of Honorable L.D. Lide, Judge of the Twelfth Circuit, from which order this appeal is taken, we adopt said order as the opinion of the Court, and direct that it be published herewith.

The appeal is hereby dismissed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM and MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES BAKER, FISHBURNE and STUKES concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

YOUNG et al. v. HYMAN MOTORS, INC., et al
(Mar 6, 1942)