Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

D. Sukowicz, Appellee, v. John Hinko et al., Appellants. Appeal of John Hinko.

CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT, § 55 — asserted defense to note as not existing. On motion to open up a judgment by confession entered against two makers of a note and a third party who claimed to be an endorser rather than a comaker, on default in payment by the makers, the third party alleged as a defense that he agreed to pay the balance of the principal on condition that the payee waive interest, and since the third party was bound to pay interest as either maker or endorser his promise to do what he was already bound to do furnished no valid consideration for payee's alleged agreement to waive interest, and the third party as a matter of law was not entitled to have a jury pass on the existence of the alleged agreement.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE FRIEND.

"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed March 24, 1942; rehearing denied April 11, 1942.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUKOWICZ v. HINKO
(Mar 24, 1942)