AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN CHIEROTTI, Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al.,Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Crim. 4382, this day decided, ante, p. 165 [ 124 P.2d 44], the order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed.

Gibson, C.J., Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Edmonds, J., concurred.

CARTER, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion this day filed in the case of People v. Gonzales and Chierotti, Criminal No. 4382, supra, I am of the opinion that the order denying the preliminary injunction should be reversed.

Houser, J., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHIEROTTI v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT
(Apr 2, 1942)