HABEAS CORPUS. — Where appellant, appealing from order quashing writ of habeas corpus, failed to file brief setting forth any errors and an examination of the record for fundamental errors disclosed that the proceedings were regular on their face and that the evidence supported order of trial court, the order was required to be affirmed.
See 6 Cal. Jur. Ten-year Supp., 254; 25 Am. Jur. 256.
LOCKWOOD, C.J.
This is an appeal from an order of the superior court of Maricopa county quashing a writ of habeas corpus.
Appellant has filed no brief setting forth any errors arising in the proceedings below. Nevertheless, we have examined the record for fundamental errors. The proceedings are regular on their face, and the evidence supports the order of the trial court.
Under such circumstances, the order appealed from is necessarily affirmed.
McALISTER and ROSS, JJ., concur.