Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

McDANIEL v. STATE.

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was tried under an indictment charging him with the offense of burglary and grand larceny. He was convicted, generally, and sentenced to serve imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of seven years.

There is no bill of exceptions. It is the law of this State that "a count charging the burglary of a storehouse [as here] can be joined in the same indictment with a count charging the larceny from a storehouse; and when an indictment contains these two counts [as here], the State will not be required to elect on which count it will proceed." Rose v. State, 117 Ala. 77, 23 So. 638.

The demurrers to the various counts in the indictment were properly overruled. Norman v. State, 13 Ala. App. 337, 69 So. 362; Rose v. State, supra.

No error appears upon the record proper; and it follows that the judgment and sentence pronounced against the defendant by the Circuit Court of Chilton County must be affirmed. And it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McDANIEL v. STATE
(Apr 14, 1942)