Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LESTER HOLLANDER et al., respondents, v. BREEZE CORPORATIONS, INC., JOSEPHJ. MASCUCH, JOHN T. MASCUCH, EMIL L. BEH, A. LANGSTAFF JOHNSTON, JR.,MELVILLE C. HEALY and JOSEPH F. LUCAS, appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in these cases relate to a final decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder. His reasons for the entry thereof appear in the record in the case. We have carefully examined them and the briefs of counsel. We can only conclude that his findings of fact are supported by the proofs and that the conclusions of law find support in the well reasoned opinions cited by him.

The decree will be affirmed, with costs.

No. 216 with No. 217 —

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

For modification — HEHER, COLIE, JJ. 2.

No. 217 with No. 216 —

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

For modification — HEHER, COLIE, JJ. 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLLANDER v. BREEZE CORPORATIONS, INC
(May 19, 1942)