Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SLIFKA, A MINOR v. VIETTIE ET AL.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — No Final Judgment — Dismissal. Where the record discloses only the sustaining of a motion to dismiss the action without the entry of any order of dismissal, no "matter reviewable" being presented, the writ of error will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

THIS matter is before us on an application for supersedeas which is accompanied by a request for oral argument on the hearing of the application.

Examining the record, we find that the last court order is merely one sustaining the motion of defendant Pete Viettie, "To dismiss the action because the amended complaint fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted." In the same order plaintiff was granted fifteen days to elect between stated alternatives. The record does not disclose any election or the entry of a final order of dismissal; consequently under rule 111 (a) (1) of our Rules of Civil Procedure, the record before us does not present a "matter reviewable" for our consideration.

Writ of error dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SLIFKA v. VIETTIE
(Nov 9, 1942)