Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KAUFFMAN v. MOUNT, Sheriff.

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, held by the Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia, on process in aid of an interstate rendition sought by the Governor of the State of Tennessee, applied for and was granted a writ of habeas corpus.

Respondent answered insisting, that the petition was without merit, but that whether so or not the matter of the custody being one of State concern should be left to the State Courts for determination. The District Judge agreeing with this view discharged the writ and petitioner has appealed.

Except under unusual and extraordinary circumstances a Federal Court will not entertain a petition for habeas corpus in respect of custody resting on State proceedings. Cunningham v. Skiriotes, 5 Cir., 101 F.2d 635; Rogers v. Peck, 199 U.S. 425, 26 S.Ct. 87, 50 L.Ed. 256; Cook v. Hart, 146 U.S. 183, 13 S.Ct. 40, 36 L.Ed. 934; Whitten v. Tomlinson, 160 U.S. 231, 245, 16 S.Ct. 297, 40 L.Ed. 406. This is true in regard to custody taken in proceedings for interstate rendition. Ex parte Dawson, 8 Cir., 83 F. 306; In re Strauss, 2 Cir., 126 F. 327.

The judgment discharging the writ was right and is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAUFFMAN v. MOUNT
(Dec 1, 1942)