AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEOPHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. v. COE.

Interference proceeding between the Geophysical Development Corp., and others and Coe, Commissioner of Patents.

Motion to dismiss the complaint, sustained.

BAILEY, Associate Justice.

Interferences are declared solely for the purpose of determining priority of invention. If the plaintiff can show priority of invention he will be entitled to a patent, if he be the first inventor and otherwise complies with the law. This right will not be defeated by any action of the Patent Office in allowing a reissue of the opponent's patent. The procedure in the Patent Office in passing upon the question of reissue is one within the discretion of the Commissioner, and it does not appear that the practice adopted in this interference of not permitting proof to be taken on the question of good faith of the applicant for reissue other than his affidavit is contrary to the usual practice.

Even if the court had power to interfere in the action of the Commissioner in this case (which is only an intermediate step in the proceedings) I cannot see that the plaintiff can be irreparably injured. As said before if the plaintiff can show priority of invention he will be entitled to a patent.

The motion to dismiss this complaint should be sustained.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GEOPHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COE, (D.D.C. 1942)
(Dec 5, 1942)