Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RILEY v. THE STATE.

BROYLES, C. J.

The defendant was tried in the criminal court of Fulton County for the offense of operating a lottery, known as the "number game," for the hazarding of money. The judge, sitting without a jury, rendered a judgment of guilty; the defendant's certiorari was overruled by a judge of the superior court and that judgment is assigned as error. The offense of operating such a lottery is a misdemeanor, and any person who maintains the lottery, or who commits any one of the various acts necessary to its operation, is guilty as a principal. The evidence, showing that two books of lottery tickets used in the "number game," and more than fifty sales of numbers to different players of the game, were found in the defendant's possession, together with her confession that she had been writing lottery tickets for three months, to get "a little money to help out with her doctor's bills," amply authorized her conviction. The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 12, 1943.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RILEY v. STATE
(Jan 12, 1943)