Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Hudgeons v. Commonwealth.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE CAMMACK

Dismissing appeal.

There is a motion to dismiss this appeal, because the transcript of the record was not filed within the 60-day period prescribed in subsection 4 of section 336 of the Criminal Code of Practice. We have frequently held this provision to be mandatory, and that this Court has no jurisdiction of an appeal unless the record is filed within the time prescribed. Salisbury v. Commonwealth, 254 Ky. 77, 70 S.W.2d 987; Ledington v. Commonwealth, 256 Ky. 678, 76 S.W.2d 910; Williams v. Commonwealth, 275 Ky. 497, 122 S.W.2d 109; Pinion v. Commonwealth, 275 Ky. 499, 122 S.W.2d 110; Carter v. Commonwealth, 285 Ky. 666, 148 S.W.2d 1043. It is apparent, therefore, that the appeal should be and it is dismissed.

Since the motion to dismiss the appeal was passed to the merits, and the case has been briefed by both sides from that view, we have read the record and have no hesitancy in saying that, had we passed upon the merits of the case, the judgment would be affirmed.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUDGEONS v. COMMONWEALTH
(Jan 26, 1943)