AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of JOROCO SILK CORPORATION, Petitioner, against ALGERON I. NOVA et al., Respondents.

Application of Joroco Silk Corporation, a defendant in an action brought by Edward I. Ackerbaum, to vacate the judgment entered in the office of the clerk of Kings County on January 18, 1943, and to direct the trial justice to pass upon petitioner's findings of fact and conclusions of law, denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. After the trial the court reserved decision and afforded the parties an opportunity to submit briefs. Subsequently the court rendered an opinion in writing, setting forth the bases of its decision, and the same was filed in the clerk's office on January 12, 1943. Therefore, it was not necessary for the court to pass upon petitioner's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 440.) Section 439 of the Civil Practice Act has no application because petitioner made no request to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law until after the cause had been finally submitted to the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF JOROCO SILK CORPORATION v. NOVA
(Feb 8, 1943)