Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP. et al., respondents, v. HENRY J. GOODMAN,appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The present appeal is from an order in the Court of Chancery denying an application to strike out complainants' answer to defendant's counter-claim. The learned Vice-Chancellor was convinced that the whole situation exposed by the pleadings raised fact issues and denied defendant's motion. In this we think he was clearly right and the order is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP. v. GOODMAN
(Feb 11, 1943)