Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Leroy S. Bendheim, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, of Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. Isadore H. Halpern, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant. Mr. H.W. Kelly, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. R.E. Lee Goff, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee. Mr. S.R. Bowen, of Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Thurman Wesley Arnold
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Leroy S. Bendheim, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, of Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. Isadore H. Halpern, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief for appellant. Mr. H.W. Kelly, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. R.E. Lee Goff, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee. Mr. S.R. Bowen, of Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.
Judges
  • Duncan Lawrence Groner
  • Henry White Edgerton
  • Thurman Wesley Arnold
See more information ...
Smart Summary

HILL v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.

PER CURIAM.

The attorney for the appellant filed a motion for continuance in the court below on the ground that his health required rest and relief from trial work for several months. The motion was denied and subsequently the case dismissed for want of prosecution. The record shows that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for continuance and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

HILL v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO
(May 17, 1943)