VIETTI v. WAYNE

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 8227.

Attorney(S)

Mr. Benjamin B. Schneider, of Chicago, Ill., with whom Mr. Lee B. Kemon, of Washington, D.C., was on the petition for petitioners. Mr. John H. Sutherland, of St. Louis, Mo., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. John H. Bruninga, of St. Louis, Mo., and Charles E. Riordon, of Washington, D.C., were on the petition, for respondents.

Judges

Justin Miller
Henry White Edgerton

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

VIETTI et al. v. WAYNE et al.

PER CURIAM.

The petition in this case is for allowance of a special appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing petitioners' complaint. The order sought to be challenged is a final one, from which an appeal in regular course is proper. No reason appearing to justify a special appeal, the petition was not granted. The case has now been dispostd of on appeal, in regular course, and an appropriate order will be entered denying the petition in the present case.

General Rules, U.S.Ct.App., Rules 9, 42(a); Federal Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 73, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; Rogers v. Watson, 7 Cir., 46 F.2d 753, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 852, 51 S.Ct. 561, 75 L.Ed. 1460; Hill v. Chicago Evanston R.R., 140 U.S. 52, 54, 11 S.Ct. 690, 35 L.Ed. 331.

Vietti v. Wayne, ___ U.S.App.D.C. ___, 136 F.2d 769, decided May 29, 1943.

VIETTI et al. v. WAYNE et al.

Comments