AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT BALDISENO, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction and order reversed on the law and facts and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: We find no evidence in the record tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime for which he has been convicted. The fact that he was with the boys who committed the larceny and that he ran away from the scene of the crime with them is not sufficient to establish that he aided, abetted or otherwise participated in the crime or that he was their accomplice. ( People v. Ligouri, 284 N.Y. 309; People v. Cohen, 223 N.Y. 406; People v. Weiss, 290 N.Y. 160.) Since all the available proof was produced at the trial, a new trial would serve no useful purpose. The judgment, therefore, should be reversed and the indictment dismissed. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of grand larceny, first degree. The order denies a motion for a new trial.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BALDISENO
(Jun 29, 1943)