Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Joe LASH v. STATE.

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals, here sought to be reviewed by writ of certiorari, is in accord with the opinion of this Court rendered in response to a certified question from the Court of Appeals under section 88, Title 13, Code of 1940, 244 Ala. 48, 14 So.2d 229, and which opinion of this Court is set out in the report of the decision of the Court of Appeals. Joe Lash v. State, 14 So.2d 235. The writ is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

GARDNER, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LASH v. STATE
(Jun 30, 1943)