Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Application of FRANK BAILEY et al., Appellants, for an Order, Pursuant to Section 61-a of the General Corporation Law, Assessing upon BUSH TERMINAL COMPANY, Respondent, the Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorneys' Fees Incurred by Petitioners in Connection with an Action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, Entitled: "C. WALTER RANDALL, as Trustee, Plaintiff, v. FRANK BAILEY et al., Defendants," and awarding such expenses as special costs reco

Orders affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the final judgment within the meaning of the statute had been entered before the date when the statute went into effect. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: LEWIS, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BAILEY v. BAILEY
(Jul 20, 1943)