Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN C. ROCHESTER, Appellant, v. HUGH G. BERGEN et al., Respondents.

Per Curiam.

Paragraph 3 of the agreement is invalid. Paragraph 2 is inseparable from paragraph 3 and falls with it. There has been no refusal or failure to perform any other provision of the agreement. The judgment appealed from denying specific performance and dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed, with costs.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROCHESTER v. BERGEN
(Oct 14, 1943)