AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MARY R. JACKSON, Judgment Creditor, Respondent, against B.L.T. GARMENT CO., INC., Judgment Debtor. DAVID BISNOFF, Third Party, Appellant.

Appeal by a third party from an order, made in the course of the examination of such third party in proceedings supplementary to judgment, which directed him to answer certain questions as to the business conducted by him. Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the order is not appealable. ( Brown v. Cadmus Holding Corp., 238 App. Div. 867; Bernstock v. Paramount Beauty Shoppe, Inc., 257 App. Div. 1004; Le Blanc v. Duncan, 260 App. Div. 953.) Insofar as the decisions in Antun, Inc., v. Viola, Appeal No. 2 ( 235 App. Div. 816), Cannon v. Otis Elevator Co. ( 265 App. Div. 944), and Kleinfield v. Katz ( 265 App. Div. 948) are inconsistent herewith, they are overruled. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF JACKSON v. B.L.T. GARMENT CO., INC
(Jan 24, 1944)