Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WINDHAM v. LONG.

FOSTER, Justice.

The assignments of error present no serious question for consideration on this appeal, except the excessive amount of the verdict.

We are impressed that the verdict is excessive, and under the authority of section 811, Title 7, Code of 1940, the amount of the verdict is hereby reduced to the sum of $300. If plaintiff remits all in excess of said sum by filing a remittitur with the clerk of this Court within thirty days, the judgment of the court below will stand affirmed, otherwise it will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Affirmed conditionally.

GARDNER, C. J., and BOULDIN and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee having failed to file remittitur, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WINDHAM v. LONG
(Feb 2, 1944)