PLEADING, § 256 — necessity of presenting desired amendment to court. Court's refusal to vacate order dismissing suit on defendant's motion, thus preventing plaintiff, as alleged by her, from filing secondly amended statement of claim," was not error, when no copy of proposed "secondly amended statement" or showing as to its contents was presented to court and there were no means for determining whether or not desired amendment would be sufficient to state good cause of action.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Opinion by JUSTICE NIEMEYER.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 28, 1944.