AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Margery A. Hogg and Dorothy E. Brown, Appellants, v. Fannie May Candy Shops, Inc., Also Known as Illinois Fannie May Candy Company and Chicago Fannie May Candy Company, and Robert Innes, Appellees.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.2 — errors requiring reversal of judgment for defendants in collision case. Judgment for defendants in action for personal injuries, sustained in daytime collision, at city street intersection, between plaintiffs' automobile and truck which was claimed to be owned by, and whose driver was alleged to be servant of, defendant corporation and which had approached from plaintiffs' right, held required to be reversed, with remandment of cause for new trial, because of trial errors in refusing to admit testimony of rebuttal witness, who had been in courtroom at least part of time after entry of order excluding witnesses, and in instructing jury.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE NIEMEYER.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 28, 1944.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOGG v. FANNIE MAY CANDY SHOPS
(Feb 28, 1944)