Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ABRAHAM J. SCHACK, APPELLANT, v. MAX WEISSBARD, RESPONDENT.

The operation of chapter 317 of the laws of 1941 ( Pamph. L., p. 856; R.S. 46:8-10) is limited to leases originating after its passage, and does not apply to a renewal of an original lease entered into, previous to its passage.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PARKER, J.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra. We find it unnecessary to consider the constitutional question treated in that opinion, for the reason that as a matter of construction we are clearly of opinion that the present case is not within the purview of the statute of 1941. The determinative clause in that act is: "Whenever a tenant whose original term of leasing shall be for a period of one month or longer" (italics ours). In this case the "original term" of one year began on October 1st, 1938, nearly three years before the act of August 4th, 1941. This statutory language, expressly prospective, cannot properly apply to any original term created, as here, prior to the act of 1941.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHACK v. WEISSBARD
(Mar 23, 1944)