AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WRIGHT v. LONG et al.

Proceeding by Curtis T. Wright against John C. Long and another, copartners doing business as Long Construction Company, and another, originally brought in state court under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On motion to remand.

Motion sustained.

OTIS, District Judge.

This case was brought in the state court under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. It has been held by this court (at least by the judge who writes this memorandum) that a proceeding brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act is not a removable proceeding. Learned counsel for defendants in their memorandum recognize that ruling. They contend, however, that this case is removable since it appears on the face of the petition that it was brought to enforce a right arising from the Constitution and laws of the United States. As a separate ground of federal jurisdiction such a proceeding must involve more than $3,000 and this proceeding involves less than $3,000. The suggestion that the proceeding is removable because the Fair Labor Standards Act is a law regulating commerce and that any proceeding brought under a law regulating commerce is a removable proceeding is a denial of the view taken by this court that the Fair Labor Standards Act is an exception to the general statute.

The motion to remand is sustained. So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WRIGHT v. LONG, (W.D.Mo. 1944)
(Mar 23, 1944)