Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

City of Chicago, Appellee, v. Jacob M. Roth, Appellant.

JUDGMENTS, § 130 — purpose of and limitations on writ of error coram nobis. The purpose of the writ of error coram nobis under the common law practice as now provided by section 72 of the Civil Practice Act, is that such writs should only be used where an error of fact occurred at the trial, of which the court had no knowledge, and which evidence could not be produced by the defendant, either through duress, ignorance or excusable mistake, and a motion in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis may not be used as a substitute for an appeal.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE HEBEL.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 26, 1944; rehearing denied May 12, 1944.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF CHICAGO v. ROTH
(Apr 26, 1944)