Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

Commonwealth ex rel. Munyan v. Smith, Warden.

Criminal law — Habeas corpus — Excessive sentence — Maximum penalty already served.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner will be discharged from confinement where it appears that the sentence for the crime charged against him was excessive, and that he has already served the maximum penalty.

PER CURIAM, April 21, 1944:

The petitioner pleaded guilty to a bill of indictment charging him with indecent assault on a female child six years of age. He was sentenced on January 29, 1942 to imprisonment in the Eastern State Penitentiary for not less than 18 months nor more than 3 years, and was committed the same day.

He asks in this petition to be released from imprisonment on the ground that the crime charged is a common law misdemeanor and that the maximum penalty for it is simple imprisonment not exceeding two years.

The district attorney and the warden, in their answers, concede that his contention is correct.

Having served more than two years imprisonment, he is entitled to be discharged.

The rule to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue is made absolute, and the petitioner is ordered to be discharged from confinement.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMMONWEALTH EX REL. MUNYAN v. SMITH
(Apr 21, 1944)