Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MILLER et al. v. MILLER.

(Syllabus.)

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure of defendant in error to file brief — Reversal.

Where plaintiffs in error have served and filed brief, but the defendants in error have neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error have appealed from an adverse judgment, and on the 26th day of November, 1943, filed their brief in support of the allegations in the petition in error. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause may be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction of the trial court and to proceed to hear and determine the cause.

GIBSON, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. MILLER
(Apr 25, 1944)