AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The PULLMAN COMPANY et al., Defendants.

PER CURIAM.

The court has given full consideration to the relief to be accorded in this case, and the views of its members upon certain of the questions arising in this connection have been expressed heretofore. 53 F. Supp. 908. A majority of the court have reached the conclusion that appropriate relief will be accorded by the provisions of the judgment entered today. In joining in the entry of this judgment, Judge Biggs, nonetheless, adheres to the views expressed by him in his opinion heretofore filed, dissenting in part, but concludes that the judgment is appropriate to carry out the decision of the court as expressed by the majority.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. PULLMAN COMPANY, (E.D.Pa. 1944)
(May 8, 1944)