MEDICINE AND SURGERY, § 26.1 — when judgment of conviction of treating alleged human ailment without license will be affirmed. As against defendant's contentions, on error to review judgment on verdict finding him guilty of violating Medical Practice Act by treating alleged human ailment without license, as to insufficiency of information, of error on part of court in directing sealed verdict and in permitting jury to Separate allegedly without defendant's consent and in allegedly denying defendant right to poll jury, as to verdict's being contrary to law and evidence, and as to defendant's not having been proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, held that judgment would be affirmed (111. Rev. Star. 1943, ch. 91, par. 16i; Jones Ill. Stats. Ann. 79.25).
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Opinion by JUSTICE O'CONNOR.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed September 11, 1944; rehearing denied September 25, 1944.