Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Edna May, Appellee, v. E. G. Marty, Appellant.

ASSAULT AND BATTERY, § 26 — when judgment for damages for alleged indecent assault on female will be reversed. On appeal to review judgment on verdict for damages for alleged indecent assault, claimed to have been made by defendant chiropractor on plaintiff, who was adult female patient of defendant, held that, if jury had been properly instructed, Appellate Court would not have been justified in holding that verdict was against manifest weight of evidence, but that, since evidence was in direct conflict, it was necessary that jury be accurately instructed and that, because there was error both in instructing of jury and also in admission of certain testimony, judgment would be reversed and cause would be remanded for new trial.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE DOVE.

Not to be published in fall. Opinion filed September 19, 1944.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAY v. MARTY
(Sep 19, 1944)