Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Apple-Cole Company et al., Appellants, v. Frank Shackel et al., Appellees.

BROKERS, § 106 — when evidence insufficient to show broker had customer willing to purchase. In action by plaintiffs to recover commissions alleged to be due them for services rendered as brokers, pursuant to written agreement with defendants to procure purchaser who was ready, willing and able to purchase real estate and business of defendants, evidence held insufficient to show that plaintiffs had purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase business of defendants at the price fixed by them in their agreement with plaintiffs.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE SCANLAN.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 6, 1944; rehearing denied November 21, 1944; released for publication November 24, 1944.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

APPLE-COLE CO. v. SHACKEL
(Nov 6, 1944)