AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH KUBRAN, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, MARGARET KUBRAN, Respondent, v. ACME BRICK CORP., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) NYACK EXPRESS COMPANY, Respondent,

Defendants in both actions are the same. A personal injury action was brought by one plaintiff in Kings County, and a property damage action was brought by his employer in Rockland County. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements against the Nyack Express Company, and the motion granted, without costs. The fact that the parties to the actions are different does not bar consolidation. ( Chemello v. Endlich, 236 N.Y. 653; Gibbs v. Sokol, 216 App. Div. 260; Dunn v. Mason, 7 Hill 154.) Both actions are based upon the same occurrence and the witnesses on the issue of liability will be the same. The case can be tried as soon in one county as in the other. The venue for the consolidated action is fixed in Kings County. Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KUBRAN v. ACME BRICK CORP
(Jan 2, 1945)