Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Donald W. Little et al., Appellants, v. Joe Gogotz, Appellee.

AUTOMOBILES AND MOTOR VEHICLES, § 167.2 — when verdict and judgment for defendant in collision case will not be disturbed on plaintiffs' appeal. On plaintiffs' appeal in action for personal injuries sustained when automobile in which plaintiffs were riding and which was being driven north on State highway was in collision, in daytime, at highway intersection, with defendant's automobile which had approached from east, wherein there were questions relating to excessiveness of defendant's speed, deposition of driver of car which was sideswiped by plaintiffs' car following collision, etc., held that, under all of circumstances of case, Appellate Court believed that plaintiffs had fair trial; that such court saw no reason to disturb verdict or judgment for defendant, and that, therefore, judgment for defendant would be affirmed.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Opinion by JUSTICE KILEY.

Not to be published in full. Opinion filed December 13, 1944; released for publication January 4, 1945.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LITTLE v. GOGOTZ
(Dec 13, 1944)