Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Bastardy — Defense claimed misconduct on part of counsel for prosecutrix — Cross-examination of defendant as to report on blood test — Counsel agreed report to be mailed to and opened in court — Physician taking blood test not subpoenaed or present as witness — Misconduct of court claimed by defense — Interference with defense counsel during examination of witnesses — Claim that verdict rendered under influence of passion and prejudice — Charge to jury — Purpose and import of introducing bastardy complaint in evidence — Right to fair trial in due course of law and justice — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article V, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS, TURNER, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.