AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; Rufus S. Ree

PER CURIAM.

This case will be affirmed for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 56 F. Supp. 862. The fact that the buildings here were permanent and not temporary structures furnishes no adequate ground for distinguishing the case from the one before this Court in United States v. City of Chester, 3 Cir., 144 F.2d 415. We gave careful consideration in that case to the real questions now before us and see no reason to modify the conclusions there announced.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
(Feb 16, 1945)