Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MITCHELL v. MARSHALL COUNTY LIVESTOCK MARKET, Inc.

CARR, Judge.

In this case the purported assignments of error are typed on a separate sheet of paper and attached to a page of the transcript with two metal fasteners, ordinarily known as gem clips.

Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 appendix, provides: "In assigning errors, it shall be sufficient to state concisely, in writing, in what the error consists, which assignment must be written upon the transcript * * *."

For the sake of the security and permanency of the records, the appellate courts have cautiously guarded the requirements of this rule. Skinner v. Jackson, 28 Ala. App. 227, 182 So. 92; Pugh v. Hardman, 151 Ala. 248, 44 So. 389; Hunter v. Louisville N. R. Co., 150 Ala. 594, 43 So. 802, 9 L.R.A., N.S., 848; E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Givens, 181 Ala. 670, 61 So. 330; Moon v. Butler Co., 9 Ala. App. 438, 62 So. 1019.

The judgment from which this appeal is taken will be affirmed for want of assignments of error as required.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. MARSHALL CTY. LIVESTOCK MKT
(Mar 13, 1945)