EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENTS, § 4 — signature of all parties to contract necessary. In action for damages upon alleged remodeling contract, where acceptance bore three lines for signatures of acceptors, but one of property owners did not sign, although line was left blank for such purpose, and day after instrument was signed another signer of instrument, prospective tenant, told plaintiff he wanted to cancel contract, and plaintiff did not venture on work, held that since evidence indicated it was intention of parties that above owner should sign acceptance and she did not, there was no contract.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Opinion by JUSTICE KILEY.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 21, 1945; rehearing denied April 10, 1945; released for publication April 10, 1945.