Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATE v. STATE.

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Petition of Manuel Pate for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Pate v. State, 21 So.2d 551.

Writ denied.

THOMAS, FOSTER, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

On Rehearing.

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The only matter upon which petitioner rests his contention for a reversal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals relates to the refusal of the trial judge to consider the twenty-six charges presented, as indicated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

Out of deference to the earnest argument of counsel for petitioner, the cause has been considered on rehearing by the whole Court. We are persuaded the case in principle is not to be differentiated from that of Kiker v. State, 233 Ala. 448, 172 So. 290, where, under what we consider very similar circumstances, the holding was that in the absence of an exception duly reserved to the action of the court, nothing was presented for the appellate court's review.

Upon reconsideration we are not persuaded our original view, in harmony with the opinion of the Court of Appeals, was incorrect. The application is of consequence denied.

Rehearing denied.

All the Justices concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PATE v. STATE
(Mar 29, 1945)