Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Manslaughter — Evidence — Testimony as to admissions of guilt, introduced before corpus delicti established — Cross-examination of own witness on ground of surprise — Statements in absence of accused — Similar acts of accused without proof as to justification.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS, TURNER, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.