Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM ARTHUR DAYTON, Appellant.

CRIMINAL LAW. — Conviction of sodomy was affirmed, where information and instructions were proper and transcript disclosed that evidence supported verdict and no reversible error was found.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, William Arthur Dayton, appealed from a conviction of sodomy. The record and transcript of minute entries and testimony taken at the trial were filed in this court. No briefs were filed nor other proceedings taken on behalf of appellant.

We have examined the information and proceedings in the lower court. The information properly states the offense of which appellant was convicted. The transcript of the testimony discloses that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict of guilty. The instructions of the court correctly state the law applicable to the facts and to the charge. We find no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

STANFORD, C.J., and LAPRADE and MORGAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE OF ARIZONA v. DAYTON
(Mar 14, 1945)