LIBERTY MTR. FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. U.S. GUARANTEE CO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Coult, Satz, Morse Coult. For the respondent, Carpenter, Gilmour Dwyer ( Carl S. Kuebler, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Coult, Satz, Morse Coult. For the respondent, Carpenter, Gilmour Dwyer ( Carl S. Kuebler, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LIBERTY MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES GUARANTEECOMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Oliphant.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, THOMPSON, DILL, FREUND, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

LIBERTY MTR. FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. U.S. GUARANTEE CO

LIBERTY MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES GUARANTEECOMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Comments